Human Computer Interaction Individual Report Essay

We as a convention we bear been bunch parturiencys to guess an existing clay and ictus the requisite improvements that should be made to the musical arrangement through comprehensive research employ the required manners to improve usability of the strategy. As a group we are to hear the drug exploiter and impound its needs through numerous of method for example, questionnaire.I within my group decided to evaluate the ashes (www.pogo.com) as it was eyeshot to inspect the system thoroughly from which some study errors were confronted.To check if these were to reverberate the substance ab partr of the system and that it was effecting the lack of tenacious and comprehensive movement from within the state of affairs i considered to evaluate the system victimisation Shneidermans 8 luxurious Rules .The military rating method constructed errors which were set in motion are to be leavened with the users and get feedback via the talk aloud and the questionnaire fro m which I with my group will be able to test the system and capture the user requirementsContent Page carve up Name Page Number drumhead 1Methods chosen, why 3Problems Encountered 3Feedback from users 4Achievements from the judgment 4 polish/ Recommendations 5Bibliography/ references 6Books 6 clear sites 6Methods chosen, whyThe larboard that chose to evaluate and redesign, was www.pogo.com as this website was not that appealing to me and I think it needs improvements as it is aimed at a family audience.To evaluate the system www.pogo.com it was required to test the system and check if the system had every major error or were they minor problems, in order for me to do this I decided to evaluate the system using the 8 golden rules of Shneidermans.The method was used to evaluate the system as this enabled me to test the colour, resolution, text, lay protrude etc and I thought this method was very useful to appoint off the usability problem that the system was stretch forth to the u sers.To carry out the evaluation I was archetypical to understand the method and then persist to explore this with the system (www.pogo.com) .The methods used for capturing user requirements were Observation, Questionnaire and talk aloud. These methods were chosen because they were Easy to explore with the system, Cost Effective and Time Effective.Problems EncounteredThe major problems encountered during the task tests were to find the appropriate user to tackle these tasks. As the methods used were demanding a wide range of user that fitted in the categories of the novice, intermediate and intellectual users, it was difficult to hide the needs of certain user as all categories were involved and from each users enamor was taken into consideration.There were novice, intermediate and expert that took the task which was a real f minorerpot for me as this would help me redesign the porthole to fulfil the usability needs.Feedback from usersFrom asking the users to complete the ta sks much knowledge was gained for what users expected within a website, from this I was able to point out the want and dislike. From this I also confess that the users choose their website to be attractive so it is enjoyable to use and users also like to take minimum count of steps to complete a particular task.The results which I obtained were very useful for redesigning the website. I implant out what different usability needs were and what features users wanted to be remained on the website, and any others which they thought required changing.From this information I chose to do a paper based image for my system because it was simple, cheap and provided quick feedback from the user.Achievements from the assessmentHaving completed the assessment I whole step that I would be able to rationalise the usability of any website/interface and from this I am able to identify usability problems such as psychological problems of the system, as well as being able to evaluate any sys tem in depth. From this assessment I have also knowledge how I would explain various methods of capturing user requirements, stating the advantages and disadvantages of the method. shutdown/ RecommendationsIf I was to do the assessment again, I would use Shneidermans Eight Golden Rules to identify the usability of the system, as I found them very useful both to understand and apply towards the website. I would also use the Ten Heuristics to evaluate the website and I would have a great image of usability in evaluating the system.If given over a chance in the future to redesign the system I would choose to do a blue faithfulness prototype but as well as this I would prefer to redesign the website in a high fidelity prototype provided that I am given extra time than provided in my first attempt. The reason for this would be that the users would seem the prototype in a low fidelity and will be given a chance then to test the system via a high fidelity prototype.As I only had cardi nal users to complete the set task, I was inefficient to get different views from users to make changes to the redesign. In the future I would ask more than users (maybe 10 different users) to complete at least three different tasks. By doing this, the users would experience more interaction with the system www.pogo.com and would comment more on the results they would hand from the task, and also whether they were able to complete the task accurately, in a minimum amount of time.Bibliography/ referencesBooksUser and task analysis for interface designBy JoAnn T. HackosJanice C. Redish charitable computing device interaction 3rd additionBy Alan Dix, Janet Finlay, Gregory D. Abowd, and Russell BealeEffective methodology for the study of HCIBy J. Kirakowski and M. CorbettHuman-Computer Interaction, 2nd edition,By Alan Dix, Janet Finlay, Gregory Abowd, Russel BealeWeb siteshttp//www.useit.com/ papers/heuristic/Lecture 3/ Usability/ military rank Methods/Talk Aloud/Page 15http//www.ic .sunysb.edu/Class/est571go/ta.htmlhttp//hcibib.org/tcuid/End PageCHI2310 Human Computer Shelley Wolfson