Organizing Relationships Traditional and Emerging Perspectives on Workplace Relationships Essay

Business ethics          matchless of the unblocks that expect raised concerns in business nowadays is the relationship amidst senior employees, and the junior employees of the opposite sex. For years, senior employees such as managing directors and directors swallow been accused of internally or emotionally abusing the junior employees on the job(p) infra them. Some are regular accused of threatening to dismiss the employees who decrease their request for knowledgeable favors from them. Though this may be seen as sexual harassment, the case might be several(prenominal)thing different from that. Simply because the relationship is mingled with senior and a junior employee, it may non be skilful to rush to a conclusion that the foreman is sexually or emotionally exploiting their subject. It may be a relationship that has developed naturally due to the level of intimacy of the two employees of the opposite gender.       The controver sial nature of this issue is clearly portrayed in the mail online article of November 13th, 2013. The article explains that the musical composition of a study carried out by business week has shown that well-nigh of these relationships amongst employees have nonhing to do with harassment. During the survey, it was found out that near of the people working in the offices would be up to a sexual relationship with someone from their office if they got the chance. Of the 2500 respondents interviewed during the survey, 85 percent said it was remunerate for employees within the company to be allowed to have sexual relationships. Some even confessed of sexually admiring their coworkers. After all this, why does the Human Resource incision discourage intimate relationships between their employees of opposite gender? The answer is that they stop that one of the parties in the relationship is sexually harassed, especially if one of the parties is the chief of the some other.  &n bsp       Some people may accuse me of supporting the behavior of the bosses to engross in sexual relationships with their colleagues. But if we consider some working conditions in some organizations, we see that the relations originate absolutely from intimacy and not harassment. Consider the case of a male manager, who works with a lady as the personal secretary. It is very possible for the two to engage in an affair due to the intimacy created by the working conditions. The two name meetings together, go for lunch together, spend time together in the office, sometimes they go together to attend meetings far from their place of work, and many other closely spent times. From all these close relation, is it not against the laws of nature for something more than boss-secretary relationship to happen? Ironically, when a relationship develops between the manager and his secretary, the manager will be accused of sexually harassing the secretary In my opinion, the boss wo uld be emotionally harassing the secretary if he chose to ignore the feelings that develop by and by been together al almost all the time.         It may also be debatable that boss-subject relationships may adversely affect the mental process of the employees. Employees may be loath in their work simply because the boss, who is supposed to supervise their work, can not condemn them because of the existing bond. This may be the idea behind the bid by the human resource department against sexual relationships at the workplace. However, this may not always be the case. This relationship may boost the performance of an employee who will always be trying to be the best to inculcate the boss. The article workplace relationships on Wikipedia explain of a theory, Workplace family Quality and information Experiences, which originated from a study conducted by Patricia Sias. The theory states the most productive employees are the ones with high access to informatio n about their workplace. It is transparent that the employees with a relationship more than the ordinary workplace relationship have a higher access to business information. I may, therefore, be honest to say that the boss-subject relationships can play an important part in boosting the productivity of the employees. The article further describes relationships at the workplace as workplace hallucination. It explains that though these relationships may not make the workplace so soft for other employees it plays a very important part in the working of the parties involved in the affair. It increases performance due to high motivation and general job satisfaction.         Even though some senior employees in some business organization sexually exploit their junior colleagues, let us not mistake every relationship for sexual exploitation or harassment. It is good to appreciate that these bosses and their subjects are just ordinary people and what makes their i nequality is only the working position and titles. When there is a relationship between two junior employees of opposite gender, this is taken to be an ordinary hunch forward relationship. Why then do we have to treat the seniors differently? Arent they the same as the juniors? What marks the difference is only job level. It is, therefore, unavoidable to analyze the situation before concluding that a boss is sexually harassing a junior workmate.ReferencesSias, P. M. (2009). Organizing relationships traditional and emerging perspectives on workplace relationships. Los Angeles SAGE.(https//www.goodreads.com/ user/new?remember=true)Sias, P. M. (2008). Organizing Relationships Traditional and Emerging Perspectives on Workplace Relationships.. meter Oaks SAGE Publications. (http//www.amazon.com/Organizing-Relationships-Traditional-Perspectives-Workplace/dp/1412957974)Source document