Thinking About Stupidity In Our Scholars :: essays research papers

The stupidity in our scholars, like stupidity and assurance everywhere, follows a model. The model presented here was developed by Anticommerical University Professor William Mason. It applies in general to stupidity at any level of intensity. It has 5 stages.1. mimetic ArroganceOne party identifies themselves as an permission on a subject and other parties imitate that arrogance. Examples of things scholars and professors are arrogant about science, literature, art, sociology, psychology, philosophy. Whatever the culture tells us is a difficult subject, thats what scholars decide is worth being arrogant about.2. mimetic Use of the Word MimeticNow the parties begin competing for the object of arrogance jargon. Whatever big, take to words emerge, others copy them. Since they all use the same words in different ways, any hope of finding concrete definitions of them vanishes. To win, you only motif to get more exclusivity of words such as exclusivity. If the word becomes ubiquit ous, indeed you make up even more complex words that bring forth simple meanings, such as ubiquitous. If this doesnt work, then you must resort to exploitation neojargon or pseudojargon or neopseudojargon or neopseud wholenessojargon. Examples of these forms of jargon are the prefixes neo and pseudo.3. GraikosGraikos is a classical word that means "Greek." Its the root of much stupidity found in scholarly discursions. In the rivalry for respect, if one side finds an inferior recitation of jargon, they are caught in the temptation of Graikos and feel compelled to retaliate by literally speaking a whole new language. Thus begins a "jargon" war, fought on the battlefield of the dictionary. Graikos is what makes it so hard to read their professional journals, so hard to feel like you have any grasp whatever on vocabulary. Its so easy to feel intellectually inferior to such unjustified usage of language. The gap between scholar and layman escalates.4. IntimidationEv entually one side crosses some arbitrary threshold of concern where the supervising regimen feel compelled to intervene. Its essentially random which side is considered the "supervising authority" since they both(prenominal) consider the other as worthless scum, but often its the religious order with more college degrees, which uses more venomous attacks to maintain parity. Whichever side is considered the "supervising authority" becomes the intimidator of the layman and the others who kept their ego below threshold are victims, deuced to low self-esteem and feelings of worthlessness.5. Authorized, Sanctioned and Sacred StupidityTo appease the scholars, the authorities suss out guilt and visit sanctions and punishment on the intimidated.