sure :: essays research papers

George W. chaparrals decision to make his premier(prenominal) overseas trip to Mexico, in mid-February, has generated a great quid of speculation about what this could possibly specify for changes in U.S. policy toward Latin America over the next quartet years. It is clear that Mexico is vastly more familiar and comfortable for Bush than all former(a) foreign country. In light of the questions raised about the origin Texas governors foreign policy experience and competence during the campaign, it is just surprising that he would look first to the country immediately to the south of the Rio Grande to show he is up to the job.Bush could be tempted to explore whatsoever initiative that would symbolize the special consanguinity he is seeking with Mexico. This would course mean responding in some fashion to Mexican President Vicente hoaxs bold proposals on the two most contentious issues in the bilateral relationship drugs and immigration. During the U.S. presidential campaign , both Bush and Gore seemed to be caught off guard by Foxs audacity. They had presumably treasured greater democracy in Mexico, but were not prepared to deal with such an independent leader who defied all of the conventions in U.S.-Mexico relations. The triumph of the first opposition figure to defeat what Peruvian writer Mario Vargas Llosa had once draw as the perfect dictatorship gave the initiative to Mexico in forging a more constructive partnership with the fall in States.It testament not be easy to take full advantage of the opportunity afforded by the stolon of both the Mexican and U.S. administrations. Fox is likely to encounter some apology within Mexico to the notion of deepening ties with the United States even further. In exhausting to serve as an interlocutor for the rest of Latin America with the United States, he will face a tough balancing act. How will Mexico retain its Latin American identityand its credibility on an adjust of hemispheric questionsas it mov es closer to the United States? Mexico, after all, played a key role in facilitating political settlements to the Central American conflicts in the 1980s and 1990s. Particularly in view of Foxs rather bold and promising gestures aimed at resolving the conflict between the Mexican government and the Zapatistas in Chiapas, the Mexican leader may well loss to become active in trying to find a cool settlement to the decades-long conflict in Colombia. Mexicos heightened visibility on Colombia and other hemispheric questions could put some strain on its special relationship with the United States, whose $1.